Black Stork Webcam Discussion 2009
- Olga
- Registered user
- Posts: 9111
- Joined: October 11th, 2008, 2:48 pm
- Location: Finland
Re: Black Stork Webcam Discussion 2009
I made a little folder of the visitor of today. Here are 11 pictures from the right side of the visitor Black stork. You can make comparitions if you want to Donna's profile! Some pics are Fraps shots from the web cam and some from Pontu.
11 pictures.
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
three pics, the right 'eye'.
11 pictures.
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
three pics, the right 'eye'.
SHoW(StorkaHolics of the World)
- Olga
- Registered user
- Posts: 9111
- Joined: October 11th, 2008, 2:48 pm
- Location: Finland
And then the left side. It's propably important, if you make comparitions to other Black storks, to compare the same side of the profiles..
The today's visitor from the left side.
slideshow, 7 pictures
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
Pontu and FRAPS pictures
The today's visitor from the left side.
slideshow, 7 pictures
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
Pontu and FRAPS pictures
SHoW(StorkaHolics of the World)
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20709
- Joined: September 20th, 2008, 1:40 am
- Location: Winchester, UK
Good pictures, Renandeli. Thanks.
Looking at his right profile, it is easy to see the deep groove down the length of the upper beak. I wonder about the age of this stork.
Looking at his right profile, it is easy to see the deep groove down the length of the upper beak. I wonder about the age of this stork.
- Lili
- Registered user
- Posts: 603
- Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 11:10 pm
- Location: Estonia Tallinn
Why not to share
First and second rows are a visitor on 10th May (from Pontu)
3th row is Toomas's first visit
4 and 5th row - Donna last year (just for comparing)
Ps I'm 100% sure todays visitor was the same B stork who was 10th May in the nest (both have " broken" back-feathers+ long beak, darker in the middle), not sure he is Toomas, better to call all stranges Toomas
First and second rows are a visitor on 10th May (from Pontu)
3th row is Toomas's first visit
4 and 5th row - Donna last year (just for comparing)
Ps I'm 100% sure todays visitor was the same B stork who was 10th May in the nest (both have " broken" back-feathers+ long beak, darker in the middle), not sure he is Toomas, better to call all stranges Toomas
- Lili
- Registered user
- Posts: 603
- Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 11:10 pm
- Location: Estonia Tallinn
One more thing about 10th May....there were 2 visits (I wonder why Pontu doesn't open those pics anymore)
12.00 + something
and 13.00+ something (minutes)
The 12.00 BS had shiny and healthy looking feathers
the 13.00 was like todays
I will edit my post and mistakes tomorrow
EDIT:
Visitor on 15May, back feathers look like ripped, it has something white on its right wing (-angle)
Visitor on 10May 13.14-13.28 (right wing...same white)
Its only pic I have saved, unfortunately Pontu don't open pics before 15May
but Renandeli saved slideshow (where can see "ripped" feathers)
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
My point: yesterday's BS is the same who visited on 10 May
But I'm not sure it's Toomas
12.00 + something
and 13.00+ something (minutes)
The 12.00 BS had shiny and healthy looking feathers
the 13.00 was like todays
I will edit my post and mistakes tomorrow
EDIT:
Visitor on 15May, back feathers look like ripped, it has something white on its right wing (-angle)
Visitor on 10May 13.14-13.28 (right wing...same white)
Its only pic I have saved, unfortunately Pontu don't open pics before 15May
but Renandeli saved slideshow (where can see "ripped" feathers)
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
My point: yesterday's BS is the same who visited on 10 May
But I'm not sure it's Toomas
- NancyM
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5690
- Joined: October 14th, 2008, 6:20 pm
- Location: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
16 May
05:00 the only difference between this morning and yesterday is that a few rags :protest: have been moved (I missed the visit, thank you for the pictures)
05:00 the only difference between this morning and yesterday is that a few rags :protest: have been moved (I missed the visit, thank you for the pictures)
- vaino
- Registered user
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: November 25th, 2008, 2:31 am
- Location: Bradenton, Florida
5:22, Same picture - empty nest, no storks. Keep watching, we never know what this day will bring !!!
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 221
- Joined: March 9th, 2009, 5:15 pm
The problem is that under different angles and different lighting market eyes and beak look differently!
Good morning all!
...Lily, thanks for the great work!
And I would say that Donna is very similar photo on the photo Lady of May 10:
1. Slot from the rostral sites. 2 small red lump over the eye area
Good morning all!
...Lily, thanks for the great work!
And I would say that Donna is very similar photo on the photo Lady of May 10:
1. Slot from the rostral sites. 2 small red lump over the eye area
- asteria
- Registered user
- Posts: 10255
- Joined: February 6th, 2009, 9:37 am
- Location: Sunny Beach, Bulgaria
I think it is a new female stork. If it was Donna, why did not she wait for Padis?
Whoever saves one life saves the world entire
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 228
- Joined: November 17th, 2008, 11:52 am
Hmm... Took Lili's pic and measured beaks (length and width at the base in pixels, using ImageJ) in images (# of row - # of image in the row), selecting images with minimal visual distortions (beak as parallel to the cam matrix plane as possible to avoid the foreshortening effect). Then calculated the length-to-width ratio (rounded).Lili wrote:Why not to share
First and second rows are a visitor on 10th May (from Pontu)
3th row is Toomas's first visit
4 and 5th row - Donna last year (just for comparing)
Ps I'm 100% sure todays visitor was the same B stork who was 10th May in the nest (both have " broken" back-feathers+ long beak, darker in the middle), not sure he is Toomas, better to call all stranges Toomas
May 10
1-1 130.40 (length) : 27.75 (width) = 4.7
1-3 120.13 : 24.95 = 4.8
2-3 121.87 : 25.52 = 4.8
April 5, Toomas
3-1 115.59 : 21.97 = 5.3
3-2 122.41 : 22.92 = 5.3
Donna
4-2 110.52 : 21.94 = 5.0
5-1 122.42 : 23.73 = 5.15
5-3 97.70 : 19.14 = 5.1
Can it mean anything? What would be the range of statistical or measurement error?
- asteria
- Registered user
- Posts: 10255
- Joined: February 6th, 2009, 9:37 am
- Location: Sunny Beach, Bulgaria
A young female I think, younger than Donna.
BTW: how can we be sure that Donna in 2007 was the same Donna in 2008?
BTW: how can we be sure that Donna in 2007 was the same Donna in 2008?
Whoever saves one life saves the world entire
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 221
- Joined: March 9th, 2009, 5:15 pm
She went to seek his ((((asteria wrote:I think it is a new female stork. If it was Donna, why did not she wait for Padis?
And you are absolutely right, Donna may be 2.
...unp, means of rostral we have three different birds
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 221
- Joined: March 9th, 2009, 5:15 pm
Would you please tell me how to download the Dutch birds on the computer? Here here, for example: http://www.beleefdelente.nl/slechtvalk
- Olga
- Registered user
- Posts: 9111
- Joined: October 11th, 2008, 2:48 pm
- Location: Finland
I watched more careful the visitors of the day the 10th May
Are there two visitors the 10th May, or has something bad happened to his/her back weathers after 12:31 when he left? ..fighting or something else..Anyway the visitor who landed the nest at 13:... has different back weathers.
slideshow of the 'back feathers' the 10th May, 4+4 pictures
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
edit: I submitted one picture more, a pic of the back wathers of the visitor of the 15th May scroll down to the last picture.
slideshow from the 15th May, 7 pictures
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
1) The visitor at 12:22 and 12:25, look at the back weathers, they are all fine
2) The visitor at 13:16 and 13:21, look at the back weathers, they are 'defected', not that fine as on the pics at 12:..
edited: visitor of 15th May, yesterday, back weathers
Are there two visitors the 10th May, or has something bad happened to his/her back weathers after 12:31 when he left? ..fighting or something else..Anyway the visitor who landed the nest at 13:... has different back weathers.
slideshow of the 'back feathers' the 10th May, 4+4 pictures
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
edit: I submitted one picture more, a pic of the back wathers of the visitor of the 15th May scroll down to the last picture.
slideshow from the 15th May, 7 pictures
http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk22 ... =slideshow
1) The visitor at 12:22 and 12:25, look at the back weathers, they are all fine
2) The visitor at 13:16 and 13:21, look at the back weathers, they are 'defected', not that fine as on the pics at 12:..
edited: visitor of 15th May, yesterday, back weathers
SHoW(StorkaHolics of the World)
- yarko
- Registered user
- Posts: 835
- Joined: October 11th, 2008, 2:40 pm
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Contact:
Good question asteria - actually we can't - that's what Urmas said too (if i'm not mistaken)asteria wrote:A young female I think, younger than Donna.
BTW: how can we be sure that Donna in 2007 was the same Donna in 2008?
Proud member of SHoW (StorkaHolics of the World)
"I love not man the less, but Nature more." Lord Byron
"I love not man the less, but Nature more." Lord Byron
- Kuremari
- Registered user
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: October 11th, 2008, 10:42 am
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Morning
you guys have been really busy with different recearch works
thanks for that!
you guys have been really busy with different recearch works
thanks for that!
Proud member of SHoW (StorkaHolics of the World)
- Lili
- Registered user
- Posts: 603
- Joined: March 2nd, 2009, 11:10 pm
- Location: Estonia Tallinn
unp wrote: Hmm... Took Lili's pic and measured beaks (length and width at the base in pixels, using ImageJ) in images (# of row - # of image in the row), selecting images with minimal visual distortions (beak as parallel to the cam matrix plane as possible to avoid the foreshortening effect). Then calculated the length-to-width ratio (rounded).
May 10
1-1 130.40 (length) : 27.75 (width) = 4.7
1-3 120.13 : 24.95 = 4.8
2-3 121.87 : 25.52 = 4.8
April 5, Toomas
3-1 115.59 : 21.97 = 5.3
3-2 122.41 : 22.92 = 5.3
Donna
4-2 110.52 : 21.94 = 5.0
5-1 122.42 : 23.73 = 5.15
5-3 97.70 : 19.14 = 5.1
Can it mean anything? What would be the range of statistical or measurement error?
it means there are two storks , huge Toomas and tiny Toomas
videoclip of huge Toomas (April 5)
mms://video.eenet.ee/2009/k2009-04-05.asf
Its unbelievable beautiful BS
- Ricky
- Registered user
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: December 23rd, 2008, 4:02 pm
- Location: Austria
Great Tit visited.
- Ricky
- Registered user
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: December 23rd, 2008, 4:02 pm
- Location: Austria
I wasn´t here yesterday, but according to your pixtures I´m sure that yesterday´s visitor was NOT Toomas.
Here´s a pic of yesterday´s visitor (posted by kenny)
And here´s a pic of Toomas (posted by asteria)
When comparing the eye shape the difference is obvious.
But be careful: If you look at Kenny´s 1st post on page 75 viewtopic.php?f=2&t=100&start=1850 you see that yesterday´s visitor´s shape of his left eye is very different from the right one. The left eye is simliar to Toomas the right isn´t at all!
Here´s a pic of yesterday´s visitor (posted by kenny)
And here´s a pic of Toomas (posted by asteria)
When comparing the eye shape the difference is obvious.
But be careful: If you look at Kenny´s 1st post on page 75 viewtopic.php?f=2&t=100&start=1850 you see that yesterday´s visitor´s shape of his left eye is very different from the right one. The left eye is simliar to Toomas the right isn´t at all!
- Ricky
- Registered user
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: December 23rd, 2008, 4:02 pm
- Location: Austria
Now I´m helpless. This is a pic posted by renandeli. It shows the right eye of yesterday´s visitor. Please compare with the upper pic in my post above. That pic shows the same eye. But it looks totally different!