Floppy Fish wrote: ↑June 7th, 2020, 1:05 pm
I read somewhere (forgot the exact link, but your link mentions it too), that great tits usually rub these caterpillars (once they're big and hairy) against the bark of a tree to remove the toxic hairs. The caterpillar in question that was fed at 6:39 seemed to have most of its hairs removed. There was another, smaller, but similar-looking caterpillar of the same type fed at 6:50 too.
It could have been a yellow-tail swan moth too. It seems a better match with the caterpillar that was fed at 6:39. It's a very closely related species, and not uncommon. It seems to be much less toxic too (tried to find any articles about it causing contact dermatitis/asthma, found none! I did find an
abstract mentioning how the brown-tail swan moth was 50-100 times more toxic than a different species of
Euproctis, so I guess it's safe to assume that most common species of
Euproctis aren't nearly as toxic as the brown-tail swan moth.)
For comparison:
Yellow-tail swan moth
Brown-tail swan moth
Oak processionary
Floppy Fish, finally my reply
It is always fascinating to learn how animals can actually make inedible feed (such as these caterpillars) edible for themselves
For me, all the caterpillars mentioned look different from the one that was fed at 6:39. This caterpillar looks much lighter at the body and has dark markings. I gave up looking for this caterpillar.
With the 3 feedings around 07:24 I could not find anything unusual except that the problems increased after feeding.
Floppy Fish, what do you think who was the last one yesterday when departure?
I laughed at him as he tried to get through the window ... probably fed too much and then flapped his wings before jumping off, does not fit through the small window
Yes, it was him with the white dots (and caterpillar 6:39)
