Testing forum functions

How this Forum Works - Questions and Answers

Moderator: ame

Post Reply
Biker
Registered user
Posts: 3149
Joined: September 21st, 2015, 11:11 am

Re: Testing forum functions

Post by Biker » February 7th, 2018, 2:05 am

no test from me, but: what a great snapshot!
you lucky one who spotted this rare seen cat.
Congratulation macko50 !

User avatar
rainyM
Registered user
Posts: 26
Joined: August 24th, 2018, 8:10 am

Post by rainyM » August 25th, 2018, 8:34 pm

Test:
Good evening to everyone :rolleyes: A young boy examining a small branch and calling for food. The picture is not good :blush:
Image

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » September 16th, 2018, 1:59 pm

this is actually testing picture quality.
is there any difference in the sharpness of these two pictures?
Image

Image

i can't see a difference. :puzzled:

balistar
Registered user
Posts: 3042
Joined: July 25th, 2017, 1:27 pm

Post by balistar » September 16th, 2018, 3:15 pm

rainyM wrote:
August 25th, 2018, 8:34 pm
Test:
Good evening to everyone :rolleyes: A young boy examining a small branch and calling for food. The picture is not good :blush:
https://up.picr.de/33658482xv.jpg?rand=1535217629
RainyM, i would say, your picture is good. At least I like it. :D

balistar
Registered user
Posts: 3042
Joined: July 25th, 2017, 1:27 pm

Post by balistar » September 16th, 2018, 3:17 pm

ame wrote:
September 16th, 2018, 1:59 pm
this is actually testing picture quality.
is there any difference in the sharpness of these two pictures?
https://up.picr.de/33834412ca.jpg

https://up.picr.de/33834413di.jpg

i can't see a difference. :puzzled:
ame, imho the first one is sharper, the second a bit more blurry.

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » September 17th, 2018, 12:02 pm

balistar, that's exactly the opposite than there should be or what i expected. :rotf:
the pictures were not taken at the same instant so in the first picture there may be less wind and thus the picture may be sharper.
the larger bit rate made a larger video file so i decided to stay with the original bit rate.

balistar
Registered user
Posts: 3042
Joined: July 25th, 2017, 1:27 pm

Post by balistar » September 17th, 2018, 1:10 pm

ame wrote:
September 17th, 2018, 12:02 pm
balistar, that's exactly the opposite than there should be or what i expected. :rotf:
the pictures were not taken at the same instant so in the first picture there may be less wind and thus the picture may be sharper.
the larger bit rate made a larger video file so i decided to stay with the original bit rate.
ame, i had suspected the same thing :laugh:

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 29th, 2019, 12:21 pm

tämä on testi, this is a test.

no languge proofing on the new computer. :puzzled:
... but the old pc has it. complains about words in Finnish and misspelled words. even pc is not approved.
strange...

User avatar
Sonchik
Registered user
Posts: 3214
Joined: September 1st, 2018, 4:59 pm
Location: Moscow

Post by Sonchik » January 29th, 2019, 12:36 pm

ame wrote:
January 29th, 2019, 12:21 pm
tämä on testi, this is a test.

no languge proofing on the new computer. :puzzled:
... but the old pc has it. complains about words in Finnish and misspelled words. even pc is not approved.
strange...
Spell check joins in the browser. At you it is included?
Excuse my (English) GT
LDF Jūras ērglis Haliaeetus albicilla 2019 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... iOqZ5js4-T
Construction of a nest with 0 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... 44GTMnC6Un

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 29th, 2019, 12:43 pm

i have Firefox in both computers and they should have the same settings. they are connected by the Firefox account. i'll try look there...
thank you Sonchik! :D

User avatar
Liz01
Registered user
Posts: 44885
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 2:06 pm
Location: Germany Berlin

Post by Liz01 » January 29th, 2019, 12:53 pm

ame wrote:
September 16th, 2018, 1:59 pm
this is actually testing picture quality.
is there any difference in the sharpness of these two pictures?
...........
i can't see a difference. :puzzled:
ame, I only found settings that gives a better picture in watching the videos/stream. That's really a big difference from before. The pictures are very sharp :2thumbsup:
I also increased the bit rate, with no visible improvement. I keep looking for good settings for recording.

I read in the description that the recording quality is closely related to the recording source and the power of the computer.
There is a possibility to record very sharp videos. But then you have for a few seconds recording, very big files

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 29th, 2019, 12:58 pm

another trial: favourite colour. favorite color.
hahaa! i found an add-on for Firefox: British-English Dictionary by Marco Pinto.
now i have proofing in British English. the American "favorite color" is underlined as faulty.
this is even better than the old proofing in the old pc. it was American. :laugh:
now also the old pc is updated with the British Dictionary.
thank you Sonchik! :bow: :laugh:

User avatar
Sonchik
Registered user
Posts: 3214
Joined: September 1st, 2018, 4:59 pm
Location: Moscow

Post by Sonchik » January 29th, 2019, 1:32 pm

I make automatic recording with the bitrate of 2000. I make entry of the screen with so high bitrate as I can.
Now I will explain why.
For example, YouTube normally loses a stream only with quality of 480p. I make entry of the screen with bitrate 5000. I load a roller on YouTube and voila! My roller will turn out with quality of 720p.
Excuse my (English) GT
LDF Jūras ērglis Haliaeetus albicilla 2019 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... iOqZ5js4-T
Construction of a nest with 0 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... 44GTMnC6Un

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 29th, 2019, 3:02 pm

Sonchik, do you record the stream from the screen (with crtl-s and selecting the capture window on the screen) or directly by opening the stream inPotplayr from the URL-address (with ctrl-u and giving the address)?

User avatar
Sonchik
Registered user
Posts: 3214
Joined: September 1st, 2018, 4:59 pm
Location: Moscow

Post by Sonchik » January 29th, 2019, 3:39 pm

ame wrote:
January 29th, 2019, 3:02 pm
Sonchik, do you record the stream from the screen (with crtl-s and selecting the capture window on the screen) or directly by opening the stream inPotplayr from the URL-address (with ctrl-u and giving the address)?
At us, as always in this question, a problem with terminology. :laugh:
Record of the screen in my potplayer is called capture of the screen on the open page of YouTube (ctrl+s).
Automatic recording (ctrl+c) I call record from a clipboard when the player itself opens the broadcasting address (which I gave it). There is no screen which the player writes down.
Excuse my (English) GT
LDF Jūras ērglis Haliaeetus albicilla 2019 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... iOqZ5js4-T
Construction of a nest with 0 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... 44GTMnC6Un

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 29th, 2019, 4:15 pm

my 1080 px normal videos always become 720 px when i upload them in the Youtube. the Youtube compresses them. i tried once increasing the bitrate when i was recording stream directly (ctrl-u to open source and the alt-c to start recording). it didn't seem to have any effect on the quality of the picture (single screen captures).

i can understand that when one is recording from screen (capture of screen) then the resolution must be highest if one wants to have good result. i always try to capture as large window as possible. but there is a limit after which enlargement does not increase quality any more.

User avatar
Sonchik
Registered user
Posts: 3214
Joined: September 1st, 2018, 4:59 pm
Location: Moscow

Post by Sonchik » January 29th, 2019, 4:53 pm

ame wrote:
January 29th, 2019, 4:15 pm
my 1080 px normal videos always become 720 px when i upload them in the Youtube. the Youtube compresses them.
I did not see at you video with quality of 720 p. Or the 1080 or 240-360 if record of a part of the screen.
You can give the reference to video from 720 p.
Excuse my (English) GT
LDF Jūras ērglis Haliaeetus albicilla 2019 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... iOqZ5js4-T
Construction of a nest with 0 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... 44GTMnC6Un

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 29th, 2019, 9:35 pm

?? i see this video in 720 px:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXfb8RlOBh4

the recording was 1080 originally. in what resolution do you see it?

User avatar
Sonchik
Registered user
Posts: 3214
Joined: September 1st, 2018, 4:59 pm
Location: Moscow

Post by Sonchik » January 30th, 2019, 3:45 am

ame wrote:
January 29th, 2019, 9:35 pm
?? i see this video in 720 px:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXfb8RlOBh4

the recording was 1080 originally. in what resolution do you see it?
Image
Excuse my (English) GT
LDF Jūras ērglis Haliaeetus albicilla 2019 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... iOqZ5js4-T
Construction of a nest with 0 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... 44GTMnC6Un

User avatar
ame
Moderator
Posts: 45915
Joined: April 7th, 2009, 10:26 pm
Location: Turku, Finland
Contact:

Post by ame » January 30th, 2019, 7:24 am

aaahhh.... i think i understand at last. i have misunderstood. :blush: :slap:
the video is shown in 1080 px but if i download it i can get only a 720 px-version. two different things.

the picture made me understand at last. thank you Sonchik!

Post Reply

Return to “Questions and Help”