it was something less than 1000 in width... just a sec...
i found your instrucitons in "Wellcome to Looduskalender forum (
viewtopic.php?p=71#p71)
"Posting images, screen captures, etc.
Please restrict picture sizes to not greater than 800 x 600 pixels, except on special topics which are indicated."
yours was something like just above 1000 pixels in width so downscaling to 80 % should do the trick. - i think this guideline could read: "width not larger than about 800 and/or hight les than about 600". whichever is larger should determine. fixed size can lead to distorted proportions in the picture (stretched either in height or width; unnaturally long-necked eagles for example

)
i haven't been so fussy about the sizes of pictures here though there have been some slightly oversized pictures. -why that has happened is a bit of a mystery to me, because the default size that our cameras give is within the limits.
i'm so lazy person that i always do things in the easiest way. rezing pictures is extra trouble to me. the screencaptures we get from these cameras are within limits so my philosophy is "why to change the size?". -Renno's pictures of his babies have been another thing. normal camerapictures are so much oversized that i have rescaled then to smaller sizes.
