brofasa wrote: May 8th, 2024, 2:46 pm
Hello Brofasa.
My guess is also that the visitor was a female. But I can't be entirely sure of that.
Although behaviour can help us determine gender, as Swenja rightly points out, we should (often) speak with some reservations.
I think the only way to really be 100% sure of the gender of a BS observed in nature is DNA testing. Except of course in a breeding pair, where one is laying eggs.
I read a while back that birds (even in case —according to us humans!— there is no external difference between the sexes) can easily see whether there is a male or female nearby.
I think it was in a book written by Tim Birkhead. The author emphasises that birds' eyes and brains are very different from those of humans. Partly because birds can see UV light, but also because there are major differences in the structure of the eyes themselves, birds undoubtedly perceive colours differently from humans. They see things (details) and colours we cannot see.
An interesting article says that homosexual behaviour also occurs in birds.
It may in some cases (like maybe lone BS males?) reduce stress, reduce social tension, and increase mating opportunities
"MOTHER NATURE NETWORK"
Evolution of homosexuality in birds explained
"A new study published this week may mark the end of the theory that homosexuality only has evolutionary disadvantages, according to
Nature*.
The findings, based on observations of 93 bird species that are known to engage in homosexual activity, revealed that the amount of time males or females put toward parental care was proportional to how often they engage in homosexual behavior.
This means that homosexuality may not be costly for birds that have plenty of mating opportunities because of lower parenting demands, said Geoff MacFarlane, one of the study's principal researchers.
In other words, since some animals can devote more energy toward mating behavior than to raising offspring, there is wiggle room for homosexuality to become a common behavior without sacrificing evolutionary efficiency.
Previously, biologists struggled to explain how homosexuality could have evolved since it distracts animals from sexual activity that directly produces offspring. The fact that it had evolved was difficult to deny: more than 130 species of birds participate in homosexual activity. For example, among Laysan albatrosses, as many as 31 percent of all pairings are female-female. Among graylag geese, one in five pairings are male-male.
The research team reached its conclusion by scoring each bird species based upon the relative contribution of males and females to parental chores. They found that male homosexuality is more prevalent among bird species in which the female is more heavily devoted to parenting tasks (such as tending the nest or feeding and caring for chicks). Similarly, when females had more free time, female homosexuality was more frequently witnessed.
Overall, the research discovered that 38 percent of the species studied display female–female sexual behavior and 82 percent participate in male–male behavior. In total, 5 percent of all sexual encounters among all the species was homosexual in nature.
"This is one of the few studies that explains homosexual behavior from the evolutionary point of view," said Vincent Savolainen, a biologist at Imperial College London.
Although the study dispels of the theory that homosexuality is evolutionarily disadvantageous or unnatural, it cannot determine what the ultimate explanation for homosexuality is. As evolutionary geneticist Allen Moore points out, "
this study suggests that when there's no cost, homosexuality can persist, which isn't the same as saying it's adaptive. It may be that when there's no parental care involved, it's like having a hobby." [

]
Researchers have speculated, though, that homosexual behavior in birds may help them to practice courtship displays, form alliances, reduce social tension or solidify dominance."
https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/anima ... -explained
* https://www.nature.com/articles/news.20 ... 0offspring.
And another article
Homosexual behaviour in birds: Frequency of expression is related to parental care disparity between the sexes
Homosexual behaviour occurs in over 130 species of birds, yet explaining its maintenance in evolutionary terms appears problematic at face value, as such sexual behaviours do not seem in immediate pursuit of reproductive goals. Parental care sexual conflict theory predicts that release from parental care translates to an increased propensity towards polygamous sexual behaviour. We hypothesized that homosexual behaviour(s) may be expected to increase in frequency for the sex that invests less in parental care and potentially enjoys increased mating opportunities. Consistent with our predictions, lower relative contribution to parental care for a particular sex is related to increased frequency of occurrence of homosexual behaviour. For males, highly polygynous species with minimal male parental investment exhibit higher frequencies of male homosexual behaviour, including male–male mounting and especially courtship. In socially monogamous species, male parental investment is greater, and the expression of male homosexual behaviour is lower. Similarly, among pair-bonding species, frequencies of male–male pair bonding increase with decreases in male contribution to care relative to females. When females of socially monogamous species provide less care than males, they exhibit higher frequencies of homosexual behaviour, namely pair bonding and courtship activities. Conversely, when females of polygynous species provide the bulk of parental care, female–female sexual behaviour is infrequently expressed.
Homosexual behaviour in birds is more likely to occur under scenarios of enhanced mating opportunity without necessarily influencing reproductive success and thus may exist neutrally, or alternatively provide a behavioural template co-opted for adaptive design.
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _the_sexes