viewtopic.php?p=716940#p716940
Liz01 wrote: ↑March 27th, 2020, 1:12 pm We need a new topic! Season 2020
Gaja is already here
her black feathers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN2jIURb3yA
Liz01 wrote: ↑March 27th, 2020, 1:12 pm We need a new topic! Season 2020
Gaja is already here
her black feathers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN2jIURb3yA
Thank you very much for opening the new topic
Liz01 wrote: ↑July 19th, 2021, 8:35 pm Šodien YT čatā esot bijusi diskusija par to vai un kā var noteikt melnā stārķa vecumu. Ornitologs Māris Strazds lūdza ielikt šo informāciju:
Youtube ir sarakste par to, kā var pateikt melno stārķu vecumu. Te ir divi izskata apraksta citāti, kurus viena dalībniece no kaut kurienes ir pārrakstījusi.
+++
Males are larger than females, but the sexes are otherwise alike. Young black storks do not have as a rich coloration to their feathers, but these colors become vibrant by one year of age.
The bill and legs are scarlet red, intensifying during mating season. In winter months, the bill and legs turn brown.
+++
....................
Māris Strazds
19.7.2021.
GT:
Today in the YT chat there was a discussion about whether and how the age of the black stork can be determined. Ornithologist Maris Strazds asked to put the following information:
Youtube is a correspondence on how to tell the age of black storks. Here are two quotes from the description of the look, written by one participant from somewhere.
+++
Males are larger than females, but the sexes are otherwise alike. Young black storks do not have as a rich coloration to their feathers, but these colors become vibrant by one year of age.
The bill and legs are scarlet red, intensifying during mating season. In winter months, the bill and legs turn brown.
+++
I do not want to blame anyone on the debate, because their interest is understandable. I did not look for and check from where, in order not to offend an unknown source, if I make a mistake, I will do without a guess.
But I can say that even in the serious scientific literature, so far there is no source that simply describes the appearance correctly, let alone age. There is one article by Willem Van den Bossches in Dutch Birding on how to distinguish between two-year-old birds, but it is not accurately described in "the heaviest sources". Their problem is rewriting from older "authoritative sources" without considering two things. Descriptions of birds from all ancient sources were based on shot birds and there was simply no visual information about the appearance of live birds nearby. But the appearance of a dead bird is different from a live one! Still, even in authoritative determinants (Collins Bird Guide), the description of the black stork is so inaccurate that one wants to think - the authors have not seen this bird alive nearby. An example is the second sentence "At close range ... black head, neck, brest ...". The black stork has no black feathers! They look only in low light and shade. Some things are confused compared to white storks, such as "scarlet red legs" is not for black storks, but for white storks. For black, they are orange-pink (the tone depends on the angle of the lighting, but the legs are never bright red!) With gray shields on the front of the post, which creates a dirty impression. Images of the determinant are also incorrect, because, for example, the beak of a young bird is significantly shorter than that of an adult bird (in the determinant they are almost the same). I will not correct other nonsense and inaccuracies in the determinant, but I will comment on each of the quoted sentences.
Males are larger than females, but the sexes are otherwise alike.
The male may be larger, but not always.
The opposite can also be the case for a particular pair. Males are usually heavier, but that is not the same thing. The available data on the measured adult birds do not confirm the "outnumbering " of the male, but there are few measurements. The sexes seem to be the same, but they can be distinguished. As this is currently unpublished information, allow observers to try to get there themselves. You just have to watch and think carefully.
Young black storks do not have as a rich coloration to their feathers, but these colors become vibrant by one year of age.
The first part of the sentence can be considered correct, but the second is complete nonsense. Birds can be safely distinguished at the age of two, when they are characteristically variegated - some feathers as young, some as old, and, to a lesser extent and perhaps not all birds, this appearance is maintained at three years of age. After that, the birds change their feathers continuously, presumably, each of the large feathers changes after 2 (or even 3) years. Worn feathers are dull, the older, the duller, re-grown are shiny with a bronze sheen. Neither in terms of "brightness" nor variegation, as far as adult birds (from 4 years of age) are concerned, their age CANNOT be said. It is safe to tell the age of a bird if it is ringed and the age is known from the ringing data.
The bill and legs are scarlet red, intensifying during mating season.
I have already written about feet. The beak is red and does not turn redder during mating, as might be understood from the text, on the contrary, it has a distinctly yellow tip, i. the beak becomes "brighter" and brighter
in the winter months, the bill and legs turn brown.
Just nonsense. The appearance of the winter months is from a 2-year-old bird.
In general, I would advise any participants in such discussions to refrain from demonstrating "knowledge" on issues that
where this knowledge does not exist. ...
Māris Strazds
19.7.2021.
I agree with every worth! I just don't feel like arguing anymore when some see themselves as experts.
We are only observers, we only see what is happening on the cameras. Not more! The camera falsifies color and size of the birds.
And none of us are expert enough to see the plumage and can tell the age or gender!
March 25Liz01 wrote: Vērotāja thank you!
Info (completely new to me!) :
In one of the meetings, Māris Strazdu said that males can fly for food to quite distant places, but females usually gattering food relatively close to the nest. If there is nothing nearby, then the female does not have anything to eat. In such drought and heat, the small forest streams and ditches have since long dried up.
https://www.looduskalender.ee/forum/vie ... 78#p820478
Yes, she is early. One can not exclude that she was in Spain. GSE Tönn is also the only one of the tracked GSE who takes every year the western route. Maybe some storks do the same. Unfortunately we will never know it.
I know it, Solo what extent changes on feathers take place, during the molt.